In brief
  • 64 adults ages 45 to 65 completed a 12-week trial of 10 grams creatine monohydrate or placebo, with or without exercise and dieting
  • Non-exercisers on creatine gained about 2.4 pounds of lean tissue and improved leg and bench press strength
  • Creatine plus exercise improved strength and body-fat percentage but did not add benefit for aerobic capacity

Researchers at Texas A&M University published a 12-week randomized trial on August 11 testing 10 grams of daily creatine monohydrate against placebo in 64 healthy adults ages 45 to 65, with and without training and modest dieting. Non-exercisers taking creatine gained about 2.4 pounds of lean tissue and improved strength.

Participants first chose whether to join a structured exercise and diet induced weight loss program or remain in the non-exercise group. Each group was then randomly assigned to creatine or placebo. The exercise program included resistance training and aerobic training three times a week, while exercisers followed a diet designed to create a modest calorie deficit.

Among non-exercisers, creatine improved leg press strength and bench press strength over 12 weeks. In the exercise and diet group, those taking creatine gained nearly three pounds of lean tissue and reduced fat mass. By contrast, the exercise and diet group taking placebo showed little change in lean tissue.

Adding creatine to exercise also led to greater gains in leg and bench press strength and time to exhaustion. It did not provide an added benefit for aerobic capacity. Those taking creatine had a greater reduction in body fat percentage than exercise and diet alone, which the researchers describe as the first such finding for creatine combined with exercise and diet induced weight loss.

For readers in midlife, the context is maintenance. Muscle and strength tend to slip with age and during weight loss, and preserving lean tissue makes daily movement easier to sustain. A supplement that supports lean tissue without structured exercise sounds simple, but training still mattered here for larger strength gains.

There are limits to watch. Because people selected the exercise path before randomization, comparisons between exercisers and non-exercisers are less firm than the creatine against placebo comparisons. A single 12 week study followed 64 people who completed it. It does not report long term outcomes, results outside ages 45 to 65, or the cognitive and health marker outcomes named in the paper title.

Dosing and background habits also need care. The trial tested 10 grams daily, not a range of doses. Diet intake, protein intake and daily activity in the non-exercise group could have shaped the results. A 2025 analysis of 685 clinical trials by the same research group found no significant difference in reported side effect rates between creatine and placebo. The current trial was led by Dr. Richard Kreider, professor and director of the Exercise and Sport Nutrition Lab at Texas A&M, and funded by the WoodNext Foundation through the Texas A&M Foundation.

For now, read this as a narrow result rather than a routine. Creatine supported lean tissue and strength in this group, helped more alongside training and dieting, and left aerobic capacity unchanged.

Written by

Shannon Brekke

Shannon edits the news desk and the field guides at Rooting Moss. She keeps a running list of every plant extract that has appeared in a formula this year.

More from Shannon Brekke →